Beulah - Page 277/348

"You seemed disposed, like Howitt, to accord it the title of 'Bible

of Quakerism,'" said Mr. Lindsay, in answer to a remark of hers

concerning its tendency.

"It is a fertile theme of disputation, sir, and, since critics are

so divided in their verdicts, I may well be pardoned an opinion

which so many passages seem to sanction. If Quakerism is belief in

'immediate inspiration,' which you will scarcely deny, then

throughout the 'Excursion' Wordsworth seems its apostle."

"No; he stands as a high priest in the temple of nature, and calls

mankind from scientific lore to offer their orisons there at his

altar and receive passively the teachings of the material universe.

Tells us," "'Our meddling intellect

Misshapes the beauteous forms of things,'"

"and promises, in nature, an unerring guide and teacher of truth. In

his lines on revisiting the Wye, he declares himself," '"Well pleased to recognize

In nature, and the language of the sense,

The anchor of my purest thoughts, the nurse,

The guide, the guardian of my heart and soul,

Of all my moral being.'"

"Quakerism rejects all extraneous aids to a knowledge of God; a

silent band of friends sit waiting for the direct inspiration which

alone can impart true light. Wordsworth made the senses, the

appreciation of the beauty and sublimity of the universe, an avenue

of light; while Quakerism, according to the doctrines of Fox and his

early followers, is merely a form of mysticism nearly allied to the

'ecstasy' of Plotinus. The Quaker silences his reason, his every

faculty, and in utter passivity waits for the infusion of divine

light into his mind; the mystic of Alexandria, as far as possible,

divests his intellect of all personality, and becomes absorbed in

the Infinite intelligence from which it emanated."

Beulah knitted her brows, and answered musingly: "And here, then, extremes meet. To know God we must be God.

Mysticism and Pantheism link hands over the gulf which seemed to

divide them."

"Miss Benton, is this view of the subject a novel one?" said he,

looking at her very intently.

"No; a singular passage in the 'Biographia Literaria' suggested it

to me long ago. But unwelcome hints are rarely accepted, you know."

"Why unwelcome in this case?"

She looked at him, but made no reply, and none was needed. He

understood why, and said quietly yet impressively: "It sets the seal of necessity upon Revelation. Not the mystical

intuitions of the dreamers, who would fain teach of continued direct

inspiration from God, even at the present time, but the revelation

which began in Genesis and ended with John on Patmos. The very

absurdities of philosophy are the most potent arguments in

substantiating the claims of Christianity. Kant's theory that we can

know nothing beyond ourselves gave the deathblow to philosophy.

Mysticism contends that reason only darkens the mind, and

consequently, discarding all reasoning processes, relies upon

immediate revelation. But the extravagances of Swedenborg, and even

of George Fox, prove the fallacy of the assumption of continued

inspiration, and the only alternative is to rest upon the Christian

Revelation, which has successfully defied all assaults."