Kenilworth - Page 135/408

This is rare news thou tell'st me, my good fellow;

There are two bulls fierce battling on the green

For one fair heifer--if the one goes down,

The dale will be more peaceful, and the herd,

Which have small interest in their brulziement,

May pasture there in peace.

--OLD PLAY.

Sayes Court was watched like a beleaguered fort; and so high rose the

suspicions of the time, that Tressilian and his attendants were stopped

and questioned repeatedly by sentinels, both on foot and horseback,

as they approached the abode of the sick Earl. In truth, the high rank

which Sussex held in Queen Elizabeth's favour, and his known and avowed

rivalry of the Earl of Leicester, caused the utmost importance to be

attached to his welfare; for, at the period we treat of, all men doubted

whether he or the Earl of Leicester might ultimately have the higher

rank in her regard.

Elizabeth, like many of her sex, was fond of governing by factions, so

as to balance two opposing interests, and reserve in her own hand the

power of making either predominate, as the interest of the state, or

perhaps as her own female caprice (for to that foible even she was not

superior), might finally determine. To finesse--to hold the cards--to

oppose one interest to another--to bridle him who thought himself

highest in her esteem, by the fears he must entertain of another equally

trusted, if not equally beloved, were arts which she used throughout

her reign, and which enabled her, though frequently giving way to the

weakness of favouritism, to prevent most of its evil effects on her

kingdom and government.

The two nobles who at present stood as rivals in her favour possessed

very different pretensions to share it; yet it might be in general said

that the Earl of Sussex had been most serviceable to the Queen, while

Leicester was most dear to the woman. Sussex was, according to the

phrase of the times, a martialist--had done good service in Ireland and

in Scotland, and especially in the great northern rebellion, in 1569,

which was quelled, in a great measure, by his military talents. He was,

therefore, naturally surrounded and looked up to by those who wished to

make arms their road to distinction. The Earl of Sussex, moreover, was

of more ancient and honourable descent than his rival, uniting in

his person the representation of the Fitz-Walters, as well as of

the Ratcliffes; while the scutcheon of Leicester was stained by the

degradation of his grandfather, the oppressive minister of Henry VII.,

and scarce improved by that of his father, the unhappy Dudley, Duke of

Northumberland, executed on Tower Hill, August 22, 1553. But in person,

features, and address, weapons so formidable in the court of a

female sovereign, Leicester had advantages more than sufficient to

counterbalance the military services, high blood, and frank bearing of

the Earl of Sussex; and he bore, in the eye of the court and kingdom,

the higher share in Elizabeth's favour, though (for such was her uniform

policy) by no means so decidedly expressed as to warrant him against the

final preponderance of his rival's pretensions. The illness of Sussex

therefore happened so opportunely for Leicester, as to give rise to

strange surmises among the public; while the followers of the one Earl

were filled with the deepest apprehensions, and those of the other with

the highest hopes of its probable issue. Meanwhile--for in that old time

men never forgot the probability that the matter might be determined

by length of sword--the retainers of each noble flocked around their

patron, appeared well armed in the vicinity of the court itself, and

disturbed the ear of the sovereign by their frequent and alarming

debates, held even within the precincts of her palace. This preliminary

statement is necessary, to render what follows intelligible to the

reader. [See Note 3. Leicester and Sussex.]